By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
AmextaFinanceAmextaFinance
  • Home
  • News
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • Investing
  • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
  • Videos
  • More
    • Finance
    • Dept Management
    • Small Business
Notification Show More
Aa
AmextaFinanceAmextaFinance
Aa
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Dept Management
  • Mortgage
  • Markets
  • Investing
  • Small Business
  • Videos
  • Home
  • News
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • Investing
  • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
  • Videos
  • More
    • Finance
    • Dept Management
    • Small Business
Follow US
AmextaFinance > News > Meta wins artificial intelligence copyright case in blow to authors
News

Meta wins artificial intelligence copyright case in blow to authors

News Room
Last updated: 2025/06/25 at 7:45 PM
By News Room
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

Stay informed with free updates

Simply sign up to the Artificial intelligence myFT Digest — delivered directly to your inbox.

Meta’s use of millions of books to train its artificial intelligence models has been judged “fair” by a federal court on Wednesday, in a win for tech companies that use copyrighted materials to develop AI.

The case, brought by about a dozen authors, including Ta-Nehisi Coates and Richard Kadrey, challenged how the $1.4tn social media giant used a library of millions of online books, academic articles and comics to train its Llama AI models.

Meta’s use of these titles is protected under copyright law’s fair use provision, San Francisco district judge Vince Chhabria ruled. The Big Tech firm had argued that the works had been used to develop a transformative technology, which was fair “irrespective” of how it acquired the works.

This case is among dozens of legal battles working their way through the courts, as creators seek greater financial rights when their works are used to train AI models that may disrupt their livelihoods — while companies profit from the technology.

However, Chhabria warned that his decision reflected the authors’ failure to properly make their case.

“This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta’s use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful,” he said. “It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record in support of the right one.”

It is the second victory in a week for tech groups that develop AI, after a federal judge on Monday ruled in favour of San Francisco start-up Anthropic in a similar case.

Anthropic had trained its Claude models on legally purchased physical books that were cut up and manually scanned, which the ruling said constituted “fair use”. However, the judge added that there would need to be a separate trial for claims that it pirated millions of books digitally for training.

The Meta case dealt with LibGen, a so-called online shadow library that hosts much of its content without permission from the rights holders.

Chhabria suggested a “potentially winning argument” in the Meta case would be market dilution, referring to the damage caused to copyright holders by AI products that could “flood the market with endless amounts of images, songs, articles, books, and more”.

“People can prompt generative AI models to produce these outputs using a tiny fraction of the time and creativity that would otherwise be required,” Chhabria added. He warned AI could “dramatically undermine the incentive for human beings to create things the old-fashioned way”.

Meta and legal representatives for the authors did not immediately reply to requests for comment.

Read the full article here

News Room June 25, 2025 June 25, 2025
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Finance Weekly Newsletter

Join now for the latest news, tips, and analysis about personal finance, credit cards, dept management, and many more from our experts.
Join Now
Nvidia’s big $4 trillion milestone: Why some say the stock could go even higher

Watch full video on YouTube

Why 3D printed houses are on the rise

Watch full video on YouTube

Elon Musk wants to launch a new political party. Here’s why some people think it won’t work.

Watch full video on YouTube

Why Even High Earners Are Living Paycheck To Paycheck

Watch full video on YouTube

Bank of America: Higher Yielding Preferred Stock Is Still Attractive (NYSE:BAC)

This article was written byFollowThe Investment Doctor is a financial writer, highlighting…

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

You Might Also Like

News

Bank of America: Higher Yielding Preferred Stock Is Still Attractive (NYSE:BAC)

By News Room
News

‘All the banks were lying’: Tom Hayes on his decade-long battle for justice

By News Room
News

Wall Street Roundup: Tesla Skepticism, Google Stands Out, DORK Shorts

By News Room
News

Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (DB) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

By News Room
News

Asian automakers’ profits tumble after ‘unprecedented’ effects of US tariffs

By News Room
News

The polarising power of Andriy Yermak, Ukraine’s other wartime leader

By News Room
News

Turning Point Brands: Is This ‘Smokeless’ Stock Too Hot To Touch? (NYSE:TPB)

By News Room
News

Macrons file US lawsuit over claims France’s first lady was born male

By News Room
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Youtube Instagram
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Press Release
  • Contact
  • Advertisement
More Info
  • Newsletter
  • Market Data
  • Credit Cards
  • Videos

Sign Up For Free

Subscribe to our newsletter and don't miss out on our programs, webinars and trainings.

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
Join Community

2023 © Indepta.com. All Rights Reserved.

YOUR EMAIL HAS BEEN CONFIRMED.
THANK YOU!

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?