By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
AmextaFinanceAmextaFinance
  • Home
  • News
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • Investing
  • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
  • Videos
  • More
    • Finance
    • Dept Management
    • Small Business
Notification Show More
Aa
AmextaFinanceAmextaFinance
Aa
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Dept Management
  • Mortgage
  • Markets
  • Investing
  • Small Business
  • Videos
  • Home
  • News
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • Investing
  • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
  • Videos
  • More
    • Finance
    • Dept Management
    • Small Business
Follow US
AmextaFinance > News > ‘Regime change’ or peace: Donald Trump’s head-spinning Iran policy
News

‘Regime change’ or peace: Donald Trump’s head-spinning Iran policy

News Room
Last updated: 2025/06/23 at 10:01 PM
By News Room
Share
8 Min Read
SHARE

In Donald Trump’s world, with himself as the protagonist, the conflict in Iran has unfolded in three stages over a chaotic 48-hour period.

On Saturday, it began with the US president ordering B-2 bombers to drop bunker-busting bombs on Iran’s nuclear facilities, sending the US into Israel’s war with the Islamic republic.  

On Sunday, Trump was floating the prospect of “regime change” in Tehran, delighting traditional Republican foreign policy hawks but alarming his isolationist rightwing allies.

Then, on Monday, just when the 79-year-old president appeared to be careening the US back towards the interventionist neoconservative Middle East strategy of the George W Bush era, he declared that the hatchets would be buried.

“CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE!” Trump declared on Truth Social, announcing that Israel and Iran had agreed to a “Complete and total Ceasefire” that would begin within hours. An end to the conflict, which he dubbed “THE 12 DAY WAR”, would be saluted by the world.

The trigger for Trump’s abrupt and even surreal shift towards reconciliation was the limited nature of the Iranian response to America’s weekend bombing raid.

While Tehran fired missiles at the large US military base in Qatar on Monday, it did so after giving Washington “early notice”, Trump said. Unlike the US strikes, which he said had “totally destroyed” Iran’s nuclear sites, Tehran’s barrage left the US base — and its personnel — unscathed.

The head-spinning course changes on Iran revealed once again how the US president alternates between blustery threats, efforts to cut deals, extreme measures and sudden victory laps — even when momentous issues are at stake.

The world’s trade negotiators and investors are familiar with Trump’s policy see-saws, as he slapped high tariffs on many US trading partners before rolling some back. But on national security, the president’s split personality has brought him from publicly yearning for the Nobel Peace Prize to launching a direct assault on Iran.

The latest shift towards peace merits caution. Evidence that the US bombing raid had destroyed Iran’s nuclear facilities had not been established by Monday, and Iran’s and Israel’s response to the ceasefire — or its durability — were also unknown.

But by planting the seeds of regime change, foreign policy experts in Washington said Trump had increased the pressure on supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to make more concessions at the negotiating table and not pursue further retaliation — or face a possible US effort to end his rule.

Rescue teams working outside a building in Tehran that was struck by an Israeli air strike © Ircs/ZUMA Press Wire/dpa

“[Trump] is saying: ‘There’s so much more we could do to attack the sinews of power of this regime and its key institutions. And if you retaliate in a way that gives us a reason to do more, you need to be mindful that that’s where this is heading,’” said Dennis Ross, the former US Middle East envoy and peace negotiator. 

Zineb Riboua of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Peace and Security in the Middle East, said Israel’s air strikes on Iran this month had also shown Trump how “vulnerable” the country was.

“I think [Trump] realises that a collapse is a possible scenario, and he might as well take the credit. I think this is where his head is,” she said.

Signals from the administration on its intentions have been mixed since the US strikes. On Sunday morning, top US officials including vice-president JD Vance and defence secretary Pete Hegseth, went out of their way to say the US was not seeking regime change in Tehran. Their statements were undermined by Trump floating the possibility of new Iranian leadership later in the day.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the president’s comments on Monday,

“If the Iranian regime refuses to come to a peaceful, diplomatic solution — which the president is still interested in engaging in — why shouldn’t the Iranian people take away the power of this incredibly violent regime?” Leavitt said on Fox.  

Maga loyalists were angry at the shift towards regime change, but relieved at the apparent result after Trump announced the ceasefire.

“Thank you, president Trump, for pursuing peace!” wrote Georgia’s firebrand congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene on X.  

Trump’s strike and his comments about the Iranian leadership had drawn praise from more neoconservative Republicans such as Nikki Haley, his 2024 presidential rival, and his former national security adviser John Bolton.

Some of his supporters were trying to square their faith in the president with his flip-flopping.

Charlie Kirk, the prominent conservative media host and Maga activist, had insisted that Trump was looking for a “bottom-up” revolution in Iran, rather than a US-imposed change of government. “President Trump is talking about an organic uprising. America cannot get involved in a forceful decapitation effort in Persia,” he wrote on X.

Donald Trump, left, is seen with members of his cabinet, including White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, second left, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Daniel Caine, centre, vice-president JD Vance, centre background, and secretary of state Marco Rubio, right, in the Situation Room of the White House on June 21 2025 in Washington
Trump, left, with members of his cabinet in the Situation Room of the White House on Saturday when the US struck Iranian nuclear facilities © White House/AFP/Getty Images

Robert Satloff, executive director of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said Trump would still prefer “a negotiated end to this conflict, and a diplomatic solution that could include substantial sanction relief if Iran plays its cards right”.

Comparisons with Bush’s invasion of Iraq in 2003 were faulty, he said, even as Israel — the US ally — began attacking some of pillars of Iran’s regime, such as its notorious Evin prison.

“Even if he decides to target certain regime-sensitive assets like the Israelis began doing today, we’re still a far cry from executing regime change and being responsible for the successor government as we were in Iraq in 2003,” Satloff said.

Meanwhile, Trump’s call for “no further hate” in the Middle East may yet give way to another twist — and more escalation.

Rajan Menon, emeritus professor of political science at The City College of New York, said Trump may believe a weakened Iran would now sign a nuclear deal — but this was not guaranteed.

“To stave off regime change they must show that the regime is in control and is not kowtowing to a foreign power.”

Read the full article here

News Room June 23, 2025 June 23, 2025
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Finance Weekly Newsletter

Join now for the latest news, tips, and analysis about personal finance, credit cards, dept management, and many more from our experts.
Join Now
“Politics moves markets.”

Watch full video on YouTube

Why U.S. businesses are jumping on the Dubai chocolate craze

Watch full video on YouTube

Upslope Capital’s Q2 2025 Investor Letter

Dear Fellow Investor, Upslope's objective is to deliver attractive, equity-like returns with…

The UK’s laggard approach to stablecoins reveals so much

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects…

How Trump’s megabill could “quietly destroy professional gambling” in the U.S. 🎰

Watch full video on YouTube

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

You Might Also Like

News

Upslope Capital’s Q2 2025 Investor Letter

By News Room
News

The UK’s laggard approach to stablecoins reveals so much

By News Room
News

Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

By News Room
News

Nordea Bank Abp (NRDBY) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

By News Room
News

Client Challenge

By News Room
News

US Senate backs $9bn in cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid

By News Room
News

Donald Trump’s escalating attacks on Federal Reserve unnerve investors

By News Room
News

Spain overtakes Germany as top EU asylum destination

By News Room
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Youtube Instagram
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Press Release
  • Contact
  • Advertisement
More Info
  • Newsletter
  • Market Data
  • Credit Cards
  • Videos

Sign Up For Free

Subscribe to our newsletter and don't miss out on our programs, webinars and trainings.

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
Join Community

2023 © Indepta.com. All Rights Reserved.

YOUR EMAIL HAS BEEN CONFIRMED.
THANK YOU!

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?