By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
AmextaFinanceAmextaFinance
  • Home
  • News
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • Investing
  • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
  • Videos
  • More
    • Finance
    • Dept Management
    • Small Business
Notification Show More
Aa
AmextaFinanceAmextaFinance
Aa
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Dept Management
  • Mortgage
  • Markets
  • Investing
  • Small Business
  • Videos
  • Home
  • News
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • Investing
  • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
  • Videos
  • More
    • Finance
    • Dept Management
    • Small Business
Follow US
AmextaFinance > Investing > Real Estate Fees Are Under Attack. Justice Officials Join In.
Investing

Real Estate Fees Are Under Attack. Justice Officials Join In.

News Room
Last updated: 2024/02/18 at 10:23 AM
By News Room
Share
5 Min Read
SHARE

The way real estate agents earn commissions could see big changes if the U.S. Department of Justice has its way. It’s looking to level the playing field between home buyers and sellers when it comes to fees.

Home sellers traditionally pay the entire commission to their agent, and it’s decided in advance how much the buyers’ agent will be paid. The buying and selling agent evenly split the fee, which often is 5% to 6% of the sale price. On a $400,000 home, which is close to the national median, that would cost the seller $20,000 or more. 

The Justice Department thinks that should change, according to a court filing on Thursday detailing its objections to a preliminary settlement in a Massachusetts antitrust lawsuit, and outlining its recommendations.

A group of home sellers in that case claimed that a rule for listings on a local Multiple Listing Service—a platform used by real estate agents to share data and listings—was “anticompetitive and causes sellers to pay artificially inflated, supra-competitive commission rates,” according to the complaint. The suit named the MLS Property Information Network and a number of national brokerages.   

The Justice Department isn’t a party to the case—its filing is a ”statement of interest”—but it’s the first time it has spelled out how it thinks real estate commissions should be paid broadly—and it could influence or even direct the debate about broker commissions—which is playing out in courts across the U.S.

“This is the first time that the DOJ is really showing its hand, in terms of what changes it envisions are necessary to drive a more competitive market for brokerage commissions,” Ryan Tomasello, a KBW analyst following the court cases, said in an interview.

For now, the recommendations are simply that, “but they’re recommendations that carry a lot of weight,” Tomasello said.

The Justice Department wants “an injunction that would prohibit sellers from making commission offers to buyer brokers at all,” according to the filing. Such an injunction “would promote competition by empowering buyers to negotiate directly with their own brokers.”

MLS PIN declined to comment on the filing, citing pending litigation.

The filing also may signal the intention of federal officials to get more deeply involved. In a report published Thursday, Tomasello wrote that ”in our view, the language in the filing also alludes to the likelihood of the federal government intervening more aggressively to enforce these changes.”

The Massachusetts suit is one of several recent court cases challenging the way real estate brokers are paid, variously naming brokerages, MLSs, and the National Association of Realtors trade group as defendants, as Barron’s earlier reported. At the core of many of the court battles are guidelines that require a seller’s agent to advertise the commission their client is willing to pay to a buyer’s agent.

The National Association of Realtors has said the current compensation structure “benefits consumers and creates efficiency in the real estate market.” It has also said that a change that requires buyers to pay for their own broker would “push the dream of homeownership even further out of reach” for low- and middle-income home buyers.

(
News Corp,
which owns Barron’s, also owns Move, which operates real estate listings website Realtor.com under an agreement and trademark license with NAR.)

The Justice Department objected to the Massachusetts settlement, saying it would offer ”inadequate, cosmetic changes” to the way buyers’ agent commissions are determined. Making commission payments optional isn’t enough, officials wrote.

“As long as sellers can make buyer-broker commission offers, they will continue to offer ‘customary’ commissions out of fear that buyer brokers will direct buyers away from listings with lower commissions—a well-documented phenomenon known as steering,” according to the filing.

The Justice Department has been largely on the sidelines as it appeals a previous settlement with NAR over its commission practices. The result of that appeal is expected by the end of March, says KBW’s Tomasello.

Write to Shaina Mishkin at [email protected]

Read the full article here

News Room February 18, 2024 February 18, 2024
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Finance Weekly Newsletter

Join now for the latest news, tips, and analysis about personal finance, credit cards, dept management, and many more from our experts.
Join Now
How AI is killing promotions

Watch full video on YouTube

President Trump delivers remarks

Watch full video on YouTube

How To ‘Invest’ In Private Companies Like OpenAI And SpaceX

Watch full video on YouTube

Where smart investors are moving cash in a volatile market

Watch full video on YouTube

How Stock Markets Might React After The Federal Reserve’s December Meeting

This article was written byFollowChris Lau is an individual investor and economist…

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

You Might Also Like

Investing

Why Home Builders Are Bouncing Today—and Why Their Stocks Are Good Buys

By News Room
Investing

This Beaten-Down Industrial Stock Wants to Call America Home. Why It’s Time to Buy.

By News Room
Investing

These 8 Dividend Aristocrats Can Protect Your Portfolio in a Downturn

By News Room
Investing

Some Lenders Benefit From SBA’s Troubled Loan Program

By News Room
Investing

Social Security Is in Turmoil. Should You Lock In Benefits Now?

By News Room
Investing

Hims & Hers Stock Is Due for a Crash Diet. The GLP-1 Surge Is Fading Fast.

By News Room
Investing

Opinion: The stock-market selloff isn’t over yet. Here are 4 reasons why.

By News Room
Investing

With Trump’s tariffs paused, ‘Big Three’ automakers may race to build inventories

By News Room
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Youtube Instagram
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Press Release
  • Contact
  • Advertisement
More Info
  • Newsletter
  • Market Data
  • Credit Cards
  • Videos

Sign Up For Free

Subscribe to our newsletter and don't miss out on our programs, webinars and trainings.

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
Join Community

2023 © Indepta.com. All Rights Reserved.

YOUR EMAIL HAS BEEN CONFIRMED.
THANK YOU!

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?